Public Health: General and Applied Toxicology and Multiple Chemical Sensitivities

Petro-chemicals and synthetic substances are being linked to many chronic diseases and neurological conditions.

Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS) are a huge part of a wider range of Environmental Sensitivities (ES), and affect from 3 to 30% of the population, in severity ranging from annoying to completely disabling.

It has taken far too many years for the world to start waking up to the fact that harmful substances are legally used in virtually all everyday “consumer” products (and the fact that we are referred to as consumers and not people is yet another disturbing story).

Petro-chemicals and synthetic substances are being linked to many chronic diseases and neurological conditions.

There are also a lot of symptom similarities between kids with autism and people with MCS and mould induced neurological symptoms. Adults can usually explain better what is happening to them than children can, so it has taken a long time for parents and researchers to start connecting those dots.

People with any other disability or medical condition are allowed appropriate health care and related aids, tax breaks, subsidies, insurance benefits, accommodations, and accessible housing. People with chemical injury, with MCS/ES, are denied access and even obstructed at every turn. Some but very little progress has been made for kids with autism only because they have had healthy parents advocating on their behalf.

It is beyond belief how harming people and the environment have become acceptable economic activities, while those trying to protect human and environmental health are called “special interest groups.” Something is seriously wrong with this picture.

We have a major, yet completely invisible public health crisis on our hands, and Professor Martin Pall has been working tirelessly on research to prove it. He is about to embark on another European tour to discuss his findings, and hopefully someone will invite him to Canada too. A press release about his research:

Breakthrough study on Multiple Chemical Sensitivity shows MCS is an epidemic caused by toxic chemicals; peer-reviewed paper is published in prestigious toxicology reference work.

A major paper on Multiple Chemical Sensitivity by Professor Martin L. Pall (at left) was published Oct. 23 as chapter 92 in a prestigious reference work for professional toxicologists, General and Applied Toxicology, 3rd Edition (2009, John Wiley & Sons).

Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) is also known as chemical sensitivity, chemical intolerance, and toxicant-induced loss of tolerance, with this last name emphasizing the role of chemicals in initiating cases of this disease.

Pall’s paper, entitled “Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: Toxicological Questions and Mechanisms,” establishes five important facts about MCS:

1. MCS is a stunningly common disease, even more common than diabetes. This has been shown in a series of nine epidemiological studies from the United States and one study each from Canada, Germany, Sweden and Denmark. In the U.S., approximately 3.5% of the population is affected by severe MCS, with much larger numbers, at least 12% of the population, being moderately affected. MCS is, therefore, a very large international disease epidemic with major implications in terms of public health.

2. MCS is caused by toxic chemical exposure. Cases of MCS are initiated by exposure to seven classes of chemicals. These include three classes of pesticides and the very large class of organic solvents and related compounds. In addition, published studies implicate mercury, hydrogen sulfide and carbon monoxide as initiators. All seven of these classes of chemicals have been shown in animal studies to produce a common response in the body, excessive activity of a receptor in the body known as the NMDA receptor. Furthermore animal studies have demonstrated that chemicals belonging to each of these seven classes can have their toxic responses greatly lowered by using drugs that lower this NMDA response. Because excessive NMDA activity is implicated in MCS from other studies, we now have a compelling common response that explains how such diverse chemicals can produce the disease that we call MCS.

3. The role of chemicals acting as toxicants in MCS has been confirmed by genetic studies. Four such studies have shown that genes that determine the rate of metabolism of chemicals otherwise implicated in MCS, influence susceptibility to becoming ill with MCS. These four studies have been published by three research groups in three countries, the U.S., Canada and Germany, have collectively implicated six genes in determining susceptibility to MCS. Each of these six genes has a role in determining the rate of metabolism of MCS-related chemicals. The German studies by Schnakenberg and colleagues are particularly convincing on this because of the extremely high level of statistical significance of their studies implicating four of these six genes. There is only one interpretation for the role of these six genes in determining susceptiblity to MCS. It is that chemicals act as toxicants in initiating cases of MCS and that metabolizing these chemicals into forms that are either less or more active in such initiation, influences therefore, the probability that a person will become ill with MCS. It is clear, therefore, that MCS is a toxicological phenomenon, with cases being caused by the toxic response to chemical exposure.

4. We have, a detailed and generally well supported mechanism for MCS. This mechanism explains both the high level chemical sensitivity that is the most characteristic symptom of MCS, as well as many other symptoms and signs of this disease, can be generated. This mechanism is centered on a biochemical vicious cycle, known as the NO/ONOO-cycle, which interacts with other mechanisms previously implicated in MCS, notably neural sensitization and neurogenic inflammation. These act locally, in various tissues of the body, to generate local sensitivity in regions of the brain and in peripheral tissues including lungs, upper respiratory tract and regions of the skin and the GI tract. Because of this local nature, different MCS patients differ from one another in their sensitivity symptoms, because the tissues impacted differ from one patient to another. In addition to the evidence discussed above, this general mechanism is supported by various physiological changes found in MCS and in related illnesses, by studies of MCS animal models, by objectively measurable responses of MCS patients to low level chemical exposure and by therapeutic responses reported for MCS and related illnesses.

5. For over 20 years, some have falsely argued that MCS is a psychogenic disease, being generated in their view by some ill defined psychological mechanism. However this view is completely incompatible with all of the evidence discussed earlier in this release. While such incompatibility is more than sufficient reason to reject these psychogenic claims, the MCS toxicology paper lists eight additional serious flaws in the psychogenic arguments. There is a long history of false psychogenic claims in medicine, where such diseases as asthma, autism, Parkinson’s disease, ulcers, multiple sclerosis, lupus, interstitial cystitis, migraine and ulcerative colitis have been claimed to be generated by a psychological mechanism. The 2005 Nobel prize in physiology and medicine was give to Drs. Robin Warren and Barry Marshall for showing that ulcers are caused by a bacterial infection, and are not of psychogenic origin. It is clear, now, that MCS is physiological disease initiated by toxic chemical exposure that has been falsely claimed to be psychogenic.

Martin L. Pall is Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Science at Washington State University.

He is located on Pacific time in the U.S. and can be contacted at: 503-232-3883 and at martin_pall@wsu.edu. His web site is: thetenthparadigm.org

Also, from Martin Pall’s website: Approaches to Therapy

(updated to reflect that the website is no longer available)

 

One important caution: To be effective, these various treatments require, in my view, that individuals avoid stressors that may be expected to up-regulate NO/ONOO-cycle biochemistry. Those include:

1. Chemical exposure in MCS patients
2. Food antigens in those who have developed food allergies
3. Excitotoxins such as MSG and aspartame that may be expected to increase NMDA activity
4. Excessive exercise leading to post-exertional malaise in CFS patients
5. Psychological stress, especially in PTSD patients

 

Update June 2016

 

As the tenthparadigm website is down, and people are asking, here are a couple of other sites that have information about the treatment protocol:

Prohealth explains a bit of it (they seem to also be a supplement vendor, I don’t know if they are good that way or not)

http://www.prohealth.com/library/showarticle.cfm?libid=17947

 

EI Resource has more of the details about it copied on their site:

http://www.ei-resource.org/articles/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-articles/dr-palls-nitric-oxide-theory-a-treatment-options-for-chronic-fatigue-fibromyalgia-a-mcs/

Advertisements

3 responses to “Public Health: General and Applied Toxicology and Multiple Chemical Sensitivities

  1. Mine has been getting worse for years
    13 years I. Recently had 2 medical Drs
    Tell me they cannot help me. I am allergic to meds. The only things I can take is Benadryl. More allergies all the time & coming quickly now
    It’s gotten do bad I battle anaphylaxis weekly sometimes daily
    Don’t know what to do

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s